Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-4610M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2280 days newer than Core i7-4610M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-4610M - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4610M - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€270.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €270.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12893 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4610M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |