Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4600M outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4600M is 1220 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Performs up to 24% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G3930T - 87 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i7-4600M - 35 vs 37 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-4600M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
53.41130604288499%
Multi-Core
948
48.466257668711656%
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 37 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
