Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 1029 days newer than Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Core i7-3930K - 194 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 20 vs 12 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
