Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i7-3770T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2550 days newer than Core i7-3770T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 4% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-3770T - 216 vs 207 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3770T
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770T
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
605
44.03202328966521%
Multi-Core
1964
53.529572090487875%
Intel Core i7-3770T | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
