Buy on Amazon
€113.29
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2181 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €113.29 vs €133.12
- Up to 12% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.78 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3770S - 150 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 12 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
146
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.29
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770S CPU Verwendeter 4-Core 8-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,1 GHz 8M 65W LGA1155
Buy for €113.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6185 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
87%
Price, €
€133.12
85%
FPS Winner
LANCHY AMD Ryzen 5 2600X CPU verwendet 6-Core 12-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,6 GHz 16M 95W Sockel AM4
Buy for €133.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
