Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3011 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €211.0 vs €332.73
- Up to 23% better value when playing New World than Core i9-10850K - €2.09 vs €2.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 21% better in New World than Core i7-3770K - 122 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 20 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
101
82%
Value, €/FPS
€2.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €211 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.73/FPS
76%
Price, €
€332.73
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €332.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |