Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2991 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €211.0 vs €579.7
- Up to 62% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €0.84 vs €2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 77 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-3770K - 261 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 24 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
251
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €211 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 424 minutes ago
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 425 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |