Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €154.27 vs €425.94
- Up to 59% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i9-10900K - €0.77 vs €1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-3770 - 228 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
201
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12981 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.87/FPS
41%
Price, €
€425.94
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €425.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12981 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |