Buy on Amazon
€154.27
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 218 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 3% better in Valorant than Celeron G1610 - 702 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
702
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Prozessor (3,4 GHz, 4 Core LGA 1155, BX80637I73770)
Buy for €154.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i7-3770 or Celeron G1610
Valorant, 1920 x 1080, High
347 FPS
€2.24/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i7-3770
8 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€777
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
