Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3720QM outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3720QM is 1710 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3720QM
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3930T - 255 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-3720QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-3720QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3720QM | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
