Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Core i7-3635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3118 days newer than Core i7-3635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3635QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3635QM - 194 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3635QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €300.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Single-Core
545
25.103638876093964%
Multi-Core
1821
19.856068040562644%
Intel Core i7-3635QM | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |