Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i7-3635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2798 days newer than Core i7-3635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3635QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-3635QM - 173 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3635QM - 20 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€332.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €332.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10639 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3635QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |