Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Core i7-3630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3748 days newer than Core i7-3630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3630QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 35% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3630QM - 208 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3630QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€615.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €615.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15867 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3630QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |