Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2923 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-3612QM - 134 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3612QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€249.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €249.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3612QM | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |