Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Core i7-3537U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 608 days newer than Core i7-3537U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3537U
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 17 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 26% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-3537U - 301 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3537U - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-3537U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3537U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Single-Core
475
50.47821466524973%
Multi-Core
943
18.714030561619367%
Intel Core i7-3537U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
