Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Core i7-2960XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 3881 days newer than Core i7-2960XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2960XM
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-2960XM - 178 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2960XM - 16 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€278
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €278 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2960XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |