Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3714 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-2860QM - 134 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€391.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €391.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |