Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2402 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-2860QM - 121 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-2860QM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
