Buy on Amazon
€69
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 1071 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-940 - 161 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-940 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - €49.0 vs €69.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-2700K - €0.32 vs €0.43 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core I7-2700K I7 2700K 3,5 GHz Quad-Core CPU Prozessor 8M 95W LGA 1155
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 449 minutes ago
CHYYAC Intel Core I7-940 I7 940 2,9 GHz Quad-Core-CPU-Prozessor 130 W 8 MB LGA 1366
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
