Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2954 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - €105.52 vs €579.7
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 9 3950X - €0.45 vs €2.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-2700K - 246 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
232
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €105.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 996 minutes ago
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 997 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |