Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3725 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 13% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Core i7-2635QM - 87 vs 77 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €73.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |