Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 1214 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 45 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-2635QM - 506 vs 504 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2635QM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
