Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €70.21 vs €120.56
- Up to 33% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-10400 - €0.63 vs €0.94 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 15% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-2600 - 128 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600 - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
111
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
67%
Price, €
€120.56
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €120.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |