Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-14700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-14700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i7-14700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €413.76 vs €499.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900K - €2.6 vs €3.06 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-14700F - 163 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
159
97%
Value, €/FPS
€2.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€413.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €413.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Buy for €499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |