Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Core i5-7400 - 166 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €200.74 vs €336.6
- Up to 34% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-13700KF - €1.34 vs €2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
66%
Price, €
€336.6
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €336.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
150
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €200.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |