Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 1487 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9100 - 220 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €81.16 vs €342.78
- Up to 72% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700KF - €0.43 vs €1.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
27%
Price, €
€342.78
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €342.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
187
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |