Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8400 - 219 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €177.5 vs €384.26
- Up to 46% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700K - €0.95 vs €1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
54%
Price, €
€384.26
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €384.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
186
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €177.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |