Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10400 - 167 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €129.68 vs €351.69
- Up to 60% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-13700K - €0.84 vs €2.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.11/FPS
39%
Price, €
€351.69
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €351.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |