Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Core i3-10320 - 229 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €183.01 vs €416.68
- Up to 51% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700K - €0.9 vs €1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.82/FPS
49%
Price, €
€416.68
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €416.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€183.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €183.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |