Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-10105F - 486 vs 417 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €59.0 vs €351.71
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-13700K - €0.14 vs €0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
486
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
19%
Price, €
€351.71
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €351.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
417
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |