Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-13700K vs Ryzen 9 3900XT

Core i7-13700K vs Ryzen 9 3900XT: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-13700K

3.4 GHz | 16-core

Intel Core i7-13700K Logo
Intel® Core™ i7-13700K Desktop-Prozessor 16 Kerne (8 P-cores und 8 E-cores) 30 MB Cache, bis zu 5,4 GHz

Buy for 390.97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4320 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

3.8 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Logo
AMD RyzenTM 9 3900XT Prozessor (12 Kerne/24 Threads, 70MB Cache, bis zu 4,7 GHz Max Boost) - ohne Kühler, AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Buy for 579.7 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4320 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-13700K

3.4 GHz | 16-core

Intel Core i7-13700K Logo
Intel® Core™ i7-13700K Desktop-Prozessor 16 Kerne (8 P-cores und 8 E-cores) 30 MB Cache, bis zu 5,4 GHz

Buy for 390.97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4320 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

3.8 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Logo
AMD RyzenTM 9 3900XT Prozessor (12 Kerne/24 Threads, 70MB Cache, bis zu 4,7 GHz Max Boost) - ohne Kühler, AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Buy for 579.7 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4320 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 812 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K

  • Performs up to 10% better in HITMAN 3 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - 227 vs 206 FPS
  • Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €390.97 vs €579.7
  • Up to 39% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €1.72 vs €2.81 per FPS
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

  • Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 105 vs 125 Watts
This is a free version of HITMAN 3.
HITMAN 3

HITMAN 3

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-13700K Logo
Core i7-13700K

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022


FPS

227

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.72/FPS

100%

Price, €

€390.97

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Core™ i7-13700K Desktop-Prozessor 16 Kerne (8 P-cores und 8 E-cores) 30 MB Cache, bis zu 5,4 GHz

Buy for 390.97 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4320 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Logo
Ryzen 9 3900XT

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020


FPS

206

90%

Value, €/FPS

€2.81/FPS

61%

Price, €

€579.7

67%

AMD RyzenTM 9 3900XT Prozessor (12 Kerne/24 Threads, 70MB Cache, bis zu 4,7 GHz Max Boost) - ohne Kühler, AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Buy for 579.7 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4320 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-13700K Logo
Core i7-13700K

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Logo
Ryzen 9 3900XT

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-13700K Logo
Core i7-13700K

Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022


Single-Core

2840

100%

Multi-Core

17611

100%

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Logo
Ryzen 9 3900XT

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020


Single-Core

1729

60%

Multi-Core

10030

56%

Intel Core i7-13700K Logo

Intel Core i7-13700K

vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Sep 27th, 2022
Release DateJul 7th, 2020
Core i7CollectionRyzen 9
Raptor LakeCodenameMatisse
Intel Socket 1700SocketAMD Socket AM4
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
16
Cores12
24Threads24
3.4 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.8 GHz
5.4 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed4.7 GHz
125 WTDP
105 W
10 nmProcess Size
7 nm
34.0xMultiplier
39.0x
UHD Graphics 770
Integrated GraphicsNone
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using Core i7-13700K or Ryzen 9 3900XT

HITMAN 3, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.