Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2743 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 11% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-6400 - 147 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €89.94 vs €383.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-13700F - €0.68 vs €2.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.61/FPS
26%
Price, €
€383.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
133
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |