Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-13700 vs Core i9-10900X

Core i7-13700 vs Core i9-10900X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-13700

2.1 GHz | 16-core

Intel Core i7-13700 Logo
Intel® Core™ i7-13700 Desktop-Prozessor 16 Kerne (8 P-cores und 8 E-cores) 30 MB Cache, bis zu 5,2 GHz

Buy for 373.76 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74305 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i9-10900X

3.7 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Intel Core i9-10900X X-Serie Prozessor 10 Kerne mit 3.7 GHz (bis 4,7 GHz mit Turbo Boost 3.0, LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Prozessor (999PNG)

Buy for 659.85 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74306 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-13700

2.1 GHz | 16-core

Intel Core i7-13700 Logo
Intel® Core™ i7-13700 Desktop-Prozessor 16 Kerne (8 P-cores und 8 E-cores) 30 MB Cache, bis zu 5,2 GHz

Buy for 373.76 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74305 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i9-10900X

3.7 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Intel Core i9-10900X X-Serie Prozessor 10 Kerne mit 3.7 GHz (bis 4,7 GHz mit Turbo Boost 3.0, LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Prozessor (999PNG)

Buy for 659.85 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74306 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 1173 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700

  • Performs up to 16% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-10900X - 168 vs 145 FPS
  • Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €373.76 vs €659.85
  • Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Need For Speed Unbound.
Need For Speed Unbound

Need For Speed Unbound

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-13700 Logo
Core i7-13700

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

168

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€373.76

100%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i7-13700 Desktop-Prozessor 16 Kerne (8 P-cores und 8 E-cores) 30 MB Cache, bis zu 5,2 GHz

Buy for 373.76 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74305 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Core i9-10900X

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019


FPS

145

86.30952380952381%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€659.85

56%

Intel Core i9-10900X X-Serie Prozessor 10 Kerne mit 3.7 GHz (bis 4,7 GHz mit Turbo Boost 3.0, LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Prozessor (999PNG)

Buy for 659.85 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74306 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-13700 Logo
Core i7-13700

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Core i9-10900X

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-13700 Logo
Core i7-13700

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2632

100%

Multi-Core

14759

100%

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Core i9-10900X

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019


Single-Core

1576

59.87841945288754%

Multi-Core

9371

63.49346161664069%

Intel Core i7-13700 Logo

Intel Core i7-13700

vs
Intel Core i9-10900X Logo

Intel Core i9-10900X

Jan 4th, 2023
Release DateOct 19th, 2019
Core i7CollectionCore i9 Extreme
Raptor LakeCodenameCascade Lake
Intel Socket 1700SocketIntel Socket 2066
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
16
Cores10
24
Threads20
2.1 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed4.5 GHz
65 W
TDP165 W
10 nm
Process Size14 nm
21.0xMultiplier
37.0x
UHD Graphics 770
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Core i7-13700 or Core i9-10900X

Need For Speed Unbound, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.