Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700KF is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700KF
- Performs up to 71% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930T - 77 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-12700KF - €20.54 vs €257.51
- Up to 86% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-12700KF - €0.46 vs €3.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €257.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 385 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
45
58%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 384 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |