Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1185G7 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1185G7 is 2830 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1185G7
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G1610 - 230 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-1185G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
