Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-6100 - 282 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - €68.52 vs €219.39
- Up to 64% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-11700F - €0.28 vs €0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
282
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
35%
Price, €
€219.39
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
249
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |