Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-11700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-11700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-11700 - 132 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i7-11700 - €417.11 vs €447.69
- Up to 15% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-11700 - €3.16 vs €3.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
120
90.9090909090909%
Value, €/FPS
€3.73/FPS
84.71849865951742%
Price, €
€447.69
93%
Buy for €447.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57457 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€417.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €417.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
2103
77.03296703296704%
Multi-Core
8613
50.02032638364597%
Intel Core i7-11700 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |