Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10870H outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10870H is 2201 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10870H
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 132 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 45 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10870H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |