Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-10750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 663 days newer than Core i7-10750H.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10750H
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-10750H - 164 vs 159 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10750H | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |