Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i7-10750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 129 days older than Core i7-10750H.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10750H
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 45 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 10% better in FIFA 23 than Core i7-10750H - 180 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10750H - 48 vs 12 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1506.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,506.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10750H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |