Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €290.34 vs €690.13
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900KS - €1.18 vs €2.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-10700KF - 265 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €290.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11463 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
265
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.6/FPS
45%
Price, €
€690.13
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €690.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |