Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i3-10105 - 203 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €127.85 vs €249.9
- Up to 49% better value when playing Control than Core i7-10700KF - €0.63 vs €1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
51%
Price, €
€249.9
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €249.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17695 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€127.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €127.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17694 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |