Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G3900 - 595 vs 459 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €51.59 vs €249.9
- Up to 74% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-10700KF - €0.11 vs €0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
595
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
26%
Price, €
€249.9
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €249.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
459
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |