Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Core i7-6700T - 182 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - €133.41 vs €266.27
- Up to 48% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i7-10700K - €0.76 vs €1.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
52%
Price, €
€266.27
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €266.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
175
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €133.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |