Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1734 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700K - 137 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - €237.87 vs €266.27
- Up to 8% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700K - €1.79 vs €1.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 91 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.94/FPS
92%
Price, €
€266.27
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for €266.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
133
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€237.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €237.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |