Buy on Amazon
€275.06
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4150 - 136 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - €78.99 vs €275.06
- Up to 69% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-10700K - €0.63 vs €2.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.02/FPS
31%
Price, €
€275.06
28%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop-Prozessor 8 Kerne bis zu 5,1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)
Buy for €275.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7418 minutes ago
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel CM8064601483643 Core i3-4150 Prozessor (Sockel 1150, 2x 3,5GHz, 3MB Cache)
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7418 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
