Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 559 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-9400 - 272 vs 266 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €136.05 vs €247.91
- Up to 44% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-10700F - €0.51 vs €0.91 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
56%
Price, €
€247.91
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €247.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
266
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €136.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |