Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2181 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4460 - 135 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €151.03 vs €243.25
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700F - €1.21 vs €1.8 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
67%
Price, €
€243.25
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
125
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |