Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €257.33 vs €533.51
- Up to 44% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KF - €1.35 vs €2.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700 - 222 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
86%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€257.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €257.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19132 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.4/FPS
56%
Price, €
€533.51
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €533.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |