Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i5-L16G7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 57 days older than Core i5-L16G7.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 7 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-L16G7 - 138 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-L16G7 - 20 vs 5 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€332.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €332.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10844 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jun 26th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lakefield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
5 | Cores | 10 |
5 | Threads | 20 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
7 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |